Cutting Stainless Steel: The Flux-Injection Solution
The elements that give stainless steels their desirable properties produce oxides that reduce the flame cutting operation to a slow melting-away process when conventional oxyacetylene equipment is used. The solution is flux injection.
How it works: A suitable flux powder is injected directly into the stream of cutting oxygen before it enters the torch. This removes the obstructing oxides, allowing normal cutting to proceed.
Equipment: Portable flux feeding units with a vibrator-type dispenser and rheostat control for accurate flux flow regulation.
Result: The operating procedure and cutting speed become practically the same as in cutting mild steel.
Cutting Cast Iron: The Melting Challenge
Cast iron cutting with the oxyacetylene torch is fundamentally different from steel cutting. In steel, the reaction is primarily chemical — oxygen combines with iron. In cast iron, the carbon in graphite form hinders this chemical action, making it partly a melting operation rather than purely an oxidation process.
Key observations:
- Very soft cast iron is more difficult to cut than harder varieties
- The slag contains considerable melted cast iron (unlike steel, where slag is nearly free of metal particles)
- Cost is much higher than steel cutting due to larger preheating flames and higher oxygen consumption
Speed improvement technique: Feed a steel rod (approximately 1/4 inch diameter) into the top of the cut beneath the torch tip. This rod furnishes additional slag that flows over the cut and increases the temperature, improving cutting speed and reducing cost.
Thickness Limitations and Kerf Width
Maximum cutting thickness depends on:
- Type of gases used
- Oxygen pressure (may be as high as 150 psi)
| Flame Type | Maximum Practical Thickness |
|---|---|
| Oxyacetylene | 12 to 14 inches |
| Oxyhydrogen | Up to 24 inches |
Why oxyhydrogen cuts thicker: The oxyhydrogen flame is longer than the oxyacetylene flame and can penetrate to the full depth of the cut, keeping all oxide molten so it can be easily blown out by the cutting jet.
Kerf width varies with thickness:
| Material Thickness | Approximate Kerf Width |
|---|---|
| Light material | 1/16 inch |
| Heavy stock | 1/4 to 3/8 inch |
Mechanically guided torches cut thick material more satisfactorily than hand-guided torches because the flame is directed straight into the cut without wobble.
Cutting Steel Castings: The Blowhole Hazard
When cutting steel castings, blowholes present a specific danger. If the flame strikes a blowhole:
- Molten oxide will splash into the cavity
- The flame will be diverted
- Excessive sparks will appear (the warning sign)
Recovery procedure:
- Immediately move the torch back along the cut
- Direct the torch at an angle to strike the metal beneath the blowhole
- Burn away the metal beyond the cavity if possible
- Resume cutting in the normal position
Mechanically Guided Torches
For production cutting of specific outlines, shapes, or patterns, mechanically guided torches provide dramatically better results:
- Pantograph-guided torches trace the outline from a pattern or drawing
- Straight-line designs are used for linear cuts
- Circular cutting fixtures handle round shapes
- Numerically controlled torches provide programmable cutting paths
Arc Cutting of Metals
While the oxyacetylene torch cuts steel easily and accurately, many metals resist oxidation and therefore cannot be efficiently cut with flame processes. For these materials, arc cutting offers a practical solution.
Materials that resist flame cutting but respond to arc cutting:
- Cast iron (carbon in graphite form hinders the oxidation reaction)
- Stainless steels
- Manganese steels
- Nonferrous materials
The fundamental difference: Flame cutting is a chemical action — oxygen combines with iron. Arc cutting uses thermal energy to melt through the material regardless of its chemical reactivity with oxygen.
Plasma Cutting of Metals
Plasma arc cutting (PAC) represents the most advanced thermal cutting technology, operating on DC straight polarity with a transferred arc that melts through the material.
How it works: The nozzle is positioned close to the work surface. The velocity of the plasma jet is greatly increased by a restricting nozzle orifice, blowing away metal as it melts.
Advantages over flame cutting:
- Much faster than oxygen/fuel torch cutting for steel less than 1/2 inch thick
- Works on materials that resist oxidation cutting
- Can be automated with numerical control
Limitations:
- Produces kerfs with some variation in width and bevel angle
- Some molten metal may recast on cut edges and be difficult to remove
Factors affecting plasma cutting quality:
- Type and pressure of the gas
- Gas flow pattern
- Current level
- Size and shape of the nozzle orifice
- Distance from nozzle to work surface
Noise and fume reduction: Mechanized plasma cutting is often performed with the workpiece submerged in water. This also virtually eliminates oxidation of cut surfaces.
Precision Plasma Arc Cutting
A further refinement uses a magnetic field in the cutter head to stabilize the plasma arc. Lorentz forces cause the arc to spin faster and tighter on the electrode tip, confining the spinning plasma to produce a narrower kerf without reducing cutting speed.
Results from precision plasma cutting are comparable to laser cutting and, with numerical control, the process is used for production of small batches of blanks for stamping and similar applications.
Surface quality by material:
| Material | Edge Quality |
|---|---|
| Galvanized steel | Clean, burr-free edges |
| Aluminized steel | Clean, burr-free edges |
| Mild steel | Some slag may cling to edges |
The Selection Framework — Putting It All Together
How the practitioner Made the Right Choice
After months of research and testing, the practitioner developed a decision tree that guided every surfacing project at his depot. Here is the logic:
Step 1: Define the wear mechanism
- Abrasion (low-stress scratching)? → High-Chromium Iron or NiCr-C
- Abrasion (high-stress grinding)? → Not high-chromium iron or NiCr; consider cobalt-base or high-speed steel
- Metal-to-metal wear? → Cobalt-base, High-speed steel, or CuAl alloys
- Impact? → Austenitic manganese steel (heavy impact) or CoCr-A (moderate)
- Galling resistance? → NiCr alloys, especially NiCr-C
Step 2: Define the temperature range
| Service Temperature | Best Candidates |
|---|---|
| Below 400°F | All options available; copper-base alloys work here |
| 400–1000°F | High-speed steel, NiCr, cobalt-base |
| 1000–1200°F | Cobalt-base alloys (advantages not definitively established); NiCr-A/B |
| Above 1200°F | Cobalt-base alloys — clear advantage |
| Above 1750°F | Chromium plating for protection; no weld deposit recommended |
Step 3: Determine post-deposition finishing requirements
| Requirement | Options |
|---|---|
| Must be machined after deposit | Copper-base alloys, high-speed steel (annealed), NiCr (carbide tools) |
| Can be ground only | High-chromium iron, CoCr-C |
| No finishing needed | Application-dependent |
Step 4: Select the deposition process
| Process | Best For |
|---|---|
| Oxyacetylene welding | Precision control, thin deposits, small areas |
| Shielded-metal arc | General-purpose, accessible equipment |
| Submerged arc | High deposition rates, flat or near-flat surfaces |
| Plasma arc (transferred) | High-quality metallurgical bonds, controlled dilution |
| Plasma arc (nontransferred) | Large areas, anticorrosion layers, mechanical bonds |
| Flame spraying (wire) | Restoring dimensions, cylindrical parts |
| Flame spraying (powder) | Ceramics, specialized coatings |
| Flame spraying (plasma) | Refractory materials, controlled-atmosphere requirements |
| Chromium plating | Precision components, gages, tools, low-friction surfaces |
Your Next Step
You've just absorbed one of the most comprehensive overviews of metal surfacing processes available anywhere. The question is — what will you do with it?
Here are three concrete actions based on where you are:
If you're a beginner: Pick one process from this guide — flame spraying is the most accessible — and research the equipment requirements for your shop or facility. Start with the simplest application: restoring a worn cylindrical part to dimension using wire-fed flame spraying.
If you're an experienced engineer: Build your own version of the practitioner's selection matrix. Map every component in your operation that fails from wear, corrosion, or heat damage. Identify which surfacing process and alloy could extend its life — and calculate the cost-benefit for the top three candidates.
If you're evaluating surfacing for a client project: Use the comparison tables in this guide to shortlist candidate materials. Then specify field testing for the top two options — because the final selection is always dependent on experience with the particular type of service.
What wear problem are you trying to solve? And which surfacing process looks most promising for your application?
The answer to that question is the beginning of a transformation just like the practitioner's.
Context and scope
A worn-out part does not always mean a scrapped part. Hard facing transforms components headed for the scrap bin into assets that outperform the originals — and the difference between choosing the right alloy and the wrong one is the difference between a machine that runs for years and one that fails in weeks.
What Is Hard Facing?
Hard facing is a method of adding a coating, edge, or point of a metal or alloy capable of resisting abrasion, corrosion, heat, or impact to a metal component.
The process applies equally well to:
- New parts — engineering superior wear surfaces from the start
- Old worn parts — restoring and even upgrading degraded components
Think of it as giving your metal parts an armor layer — one engineered specifically for the punishment they will endure in service.
The Core Application Methods
Hard facing materials are deposited using welding and spraying processes. Each method has distinct advantages depending on the geometry of the part, the alloy being deposited, and the production environment.
| Application Method | Process Type | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Oxyacetylene Gas Welding | Manual welding | Precision deposits, small areas, repair work |
| Shielded-Metal Arc Welding (SMAW) | Arc welding | General-purpose hard facing, field repairs |
| Submerged Arc Welding (SAW) | Arc welding | High-volume, flat-position deposits |
| Plasma Arc Welding (PAW) | Arc welding | Low dilution, high deposition rates |
| Inert-Gas-Shielded Arc (GTAW/GMAW) | Arc welding (consumable & non-consumable electrode) | High-quality deposits, low oxidation losses |
| Thermal Spraying | Spraying process | Wire or powder form coatings, rapid coverage |
| Laser Cladding | Laser-based | Ultra-low dilution (<2%), dense metallurgical bond |
Welding vs. Spraying: The Critical Distinction
Welding-based hard facing creates a metallurgical bond between the deposited alloy and the substrate. The two metals fuse together at the atomic level. This bond is extremely strong but introduces dilution — the mixing of base metal into the deposited layer that can reduce hardness and alter alloy properties.
Spraying creates a mechanical bond. The coating adheres to the surface through interlocking of sprayed particles. Porosity is generally higher, but the process allows for rapid coverage of large areas with minimal heat input to the workpiece.
Laser cladding occupies a unique position. It produces a dense, homogeneous, nonporous clad layer that is metallurgically bonded to the substrate — with dilution rates below 2%, compared to 5–15% for plasma arc and 20–25% for stick electrode processes. The result is superior coating integrity with minimal alteration of the deposited alloy's designed properties.
The Dilution Problem
Dilution is the total volume of the surface layer contributed by melting of the substrate. It is the single most important variable affecting the final hardness and performance of a hard-facing deposit.
| Process | Typical Dilution |
|---|---|
| Laser Cladding | < 2% |
| Plasma Arc Surfacing | 5–15% |
| Stick Electrode (SMAW) | 20–25% |
The greater the dilution, the lower the hardness. This is why arc-welded deposits consistently show wider hardness ranges than gas-welded deposits — more base metal mixing means less predictable alloy properties in the deposited layer.
How to Select a Hard-Facing Material
The first thing to be considered in the selection of a hard-facing material is the type of service the part in question is to undergo.
Beyond service conditions, you must evaluate:
- Machinability — Can you finish-machine the deposit after application?
- Cost of the hard-facing material — Does the alloy cost justify the performance gain?
- Porosity of the deposit — Is a dense coating critical, or is slight porosity acceptable (as in bearing surfaces where oil retention is desirable)?
- Appearance in use — Does the surface need to maintain a polished or finished look?
- Ease of application — Can your shop apply the material with existing equipment?
The Fundamental Rule of Hard Facing
Generally, the greater the hardness of the facing material, the greater is its resistance to abrasion and shock or impact wear.
But hardness alone does not tell the full story. Some alloys sacrifice machinability for hardness. Others trade impact resistance for abrasion resistance. The selection always involves trade-offs — and the following alloy guide gives you the data to make those trade-offs intelligently.
The Hardenable Base Metals
Many hardenable materials can be used for hard facing, including:
- Carbon steels
- Low-alloy steels
- Medium-alloy steels
- Medium-high alloys
However, none of these is outstanding for hard-facing applications. They serve as functional overlays where extreme wear resistance is not required, but for demanding service, you need one of the six specialized alloy families detailed below.
The Six Major Hard-Facing Alloy Families
This is the core of hard-facing material science. Each alloy family occupies a distinct performance envelope defined by hardness, impact resistance, temperature capability, corrosion resistance, and machinability.
. High-Speed Steels (RFe5 / EFe5)
Designations and Forms
| Form | AWS Designation |
|---|---|
| Welding Rod | RFe5 |
| Electrode | EFe5 |
Typical Applications
- Cutting tools
- Shear blades
- Reamers
- Forming dies
- Shearing dies
- Guides
- Ingot tongs
- Broaches
Hardness Data
| Condition | Hardness (Rockwell C) |
|---|---|
| As-welded | 55–60 HRC |
| Annealed | 30 HRC |
| At 1100°F (service temperature) | 47 HRC (slow decline from 60 HRC) |
| At 1200°F | 30 HRC maximum |
Key insight: The as-deposited hardness of 60 HRC falls off very slowly up to 1100°F, dropping only to 47 HRC. This retained hot hardness is what makes high-speed steels invaluable for elevated-temperature tooling overlays. Above 1200°F, the advantage disappears — hardness drops to 30 HRC.
Resistance Properties
| Property | Rating |
|---|---|
| Impact resistance (as-deposited) | Medium |
| Impact resistance (tempered) | Appreciably increased |
| Oxidation resistance | Poor (high molybdenum content causes ready oxidation) |
| Atmospheric corrosion resistance | Good |
| Liquid corrosive resistance | Not suitable |
Other Critical Characteristics
- Metal-to-metal wear: Excellent, especially at elevated temperatures
- Hot hardness retention: Outstanding — the defining property of this alloy family
- Surface polish: Can take a high polish
- Machinability: Must be annealed first before machining; full hardness can be regained through subsequent heat treatment
. Austenitic Manganese Steels (EFeMn)
Designations and Forms
| Form | AWS Designation |
|---|---|
| Electrode | EFeMn |
Note: Austenitic manganese steels are available primarily in electrode form for hard facing.
Typical Applications
- Rock-crushing equipment
- Railway frogs and crossings
- Impact-wear surfaces
- Heavy equipment buckets and teeth
Hardness Data
| Condition | Hardness |
|---|---|
| As-deposited | 170–230 BHN |
| Work-hardened | 450–550 BHN |
This is the critical insight: The as-deposited hardness is relatively low — only 170 to 230 BHN. But austenitic manganese steels work-harden rapidly under impact. Every blow from a rock drives the surface hardness upward, eventually reaching 450 to 550 BHN in service.
The Work-Hardening Mechanism
The yield strength of the deposited metal in compression starts low, but any compressive deformation rapidly raises it until plastic flow ceases. This self-strengthening behavior is an extraordinary asset in impact wear situations — the harder the service punishes the surface, the harder the surface becomes.
Resistance Properties
| Property | Rating |
|---|---|
| Impact resistance | High — the defining property |
| Corrosion/oxidation resistance | Similar to ordinary carbon steels |
| Abrasion resistance (vs. hard abrasives like quartz) | Mediocre |
| Hot hardness | None — becomes brittle above 500–600°F |
Critical limitation: These metals have no practical hot hardness. They become brittle when reheated above 500 to 600°F. Hard facing with austenitic manganese steels must avoid overheating the deposit, and service temperatures must remain well below this threshold.
Machinability
Machining is difficult with ordinary tools and equipment. Finished surfaces are usually ground. The work-hardened surface resists conventional cutting tools — the same property that makes the alloy excellent in service makes it challenging in the machine shop.
the practitioner's Decision
This was the alloy the practitioner chose for the practitioner's jaw crusher plates. The impact loading was severe, temperatures were ambient, and the self-hardening property meant the rebuilt plates would actually get tougher in service. She deposited multiple passes of EFeMn electrode, building up the worn surfaces to original dimensions.
Within a week, the crusher was back in service. Within a month, the work-hardened surfaces had reached nearly 500 BHN — harder than the original plates had been when new.
. Austenitic High-Chromium Irons (RFeCr-A / EFeCr-A)
The Scene: Relentless Abrasion Without Heavy Impact
Not every wear problem involves impact. In agricultural equipment, coke chutes, steel mill guides, sand-blasting cabinets, and brick-making machinery, the dominant failure mode is low-stress scratching abrasion — a constant grinding away of surface material by hard particles moving across the surface.
Austenitic high-chromium irons are engineered for exactly this service.
Designations and Forms
| Form | AWS Designation |
|---|---|
| Welding Rod | RFeCr-A |
| Electrode | EFeCr-A |
Typical Applications
- Agricultural machinery parts
- Coke chutes
- Steel mill guides
- Sand-blasting equipment
- Brick-making machinery
Hardness Data
| Condition | Hardness (Rockwell C) |
|---|---|
| As-welded | 51–62 HRC |
| At 900°F (instantaneous) | 43 HRC |
| At 900°F (3 minutes under load) | 37 HRC |
| At 1200°F (instantaneous) | 5 HRC |
| After cooling to ambient from hot test | Returns to approximately original hardness |
The hot hardness profile reveals a critical design boundary. These alloys maintain useful hardness up to about 800–900°F. Above that, hardness degrades rapidly — at 1200°F, instantaneous hardness drops to just 5 HRC. However, the decrease in hardness during hot testing is practically recovered on cooling — this is not a permanent softening like most alloys experience.
Resistance Properties
| Property | Rating / Details |
|---|---|
| Impact resistance | Light impact only — deposits crack under heavy impact |
| Dynamic compression limit | 60,000 psi maximum — avoid higher stresses |
| Low-stress scratching abrasion | Outstanding — related to hard carbide content |
| High-stress grinding abrasion | Mediocre — not suitable for grinding service |
| Oxidation resistance | Good up to 1800°F |
| Hot wear resistance | Acceptable where hot plasticity is not objectionable |
| Liquid corrosion resistance | Poor — will rust in moist air |
| Stability vs. iron/steel | More stable than ordinary iron and steel |
The Abrasion Paradox
Here is where many engineers make costly mistakes: Low-stress scratching resistance is outstanding, but high-stress grinding abrasion performance is only mediocre.
The distinction matters enormously:
- Low-stress scratching: Particles slide across the surface at low contact pressures (sand flowing through a chute, grain moving over a plow blade)
- High-stress grinding: Particles are crushed between two surfaces at high contact pressures (crushing chamber walls, ball mill liners)
If you specify austenitic high-chromium iron for a grinding application, the deposit will wear far faster than expected. The hard carbides that provide outstanding scratch resistance cannot withstand the fracture mechanics of high-stress grinding.
Mechanical Properties
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Yield strength (0.1% offset, compression) | 80,000–140,000 psi |
| Ultimate strength (compression) | 150,000–280,000 psi |
| Tensile strength | Low — avoid tension loading in design |
Machinability
These deposits are considered commercially unmachinable and are also very difficult to grind.
When grinding is required:
| Parameter | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Abrasive type | Aluminum oxide |
| Grit size | 24 grit |
| Bond (off-hand, high speed) | Hard (Q), medium-spaced, resinoid |
| Bond (off-hand, low speed) | Slightly softer (P), vitrified |
. Cobalt-Base Alloys (RCoCr / ECoCr)
Designations and Forms
| Form | AWS Designation |
|---|---|
| Welding Rod | RCoCr |
| Electrode | ECoCr |
Typical Applications
- Exhaust valve contact surfaces (aircraft, truck, bus engines)
- Valve trim in steam engines
- Pump shafts (corrosion + erosion service)
- High-temperature sliding wear surfaces
The Three Cobalt-Chromium Grades
Three formulations cover the range from impact-tolerant to maximum-hardness:
| Grade | Carbon Content | Primary Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| CoCr-A | Standard | Best impact resistance of the three; moderate hardness |
| CoCr-B | Higher | Greater hardness; reduced impact tolerance |
| CoCr-C | Highest | Maximum hardness and abrasion resistance; impact not expected |
Hardness Data
Gas-Welded Deposits:
| Grade | Hardness Range (HRC) |
|---|---|
| CoCr-A | 38–47 |
| CoCr-B | 45–49 |
| CoCr-C | 48–58 |
Arc-Welded Deposits:
| Grade | Hardness Range (HRC) |
|---|---|
| CoCr-A | 23–47 |
| CoCr-B | 34–47 |
| CoCr-C | 43–58 |
Why the wider range for arc-welded deposits? The values depend primarily on base metal dilution. The greater the dilution, the lower the hardness. Gas welding produces tighter hardness ranges because it generally results in less dilution than arc welding.
The Exceptional Hot Hardness Property
Many surfacing alloys are softened permanently by heating to elevated temperatures. Cobalt-base alloys are exceptional. They do exhibit lower hardness values when hot, but they return to their approximate original hardness values upon cooling.
This reversible hardness behavior makes cobalt-base alloys uniquely suited for thermal cycling environments like internal combustion engine exhaust valves.
Temperature Service Guidelines
| Temperature Range | Cobalt-Base Advantage |
|---|---|
| Below 1000°F | Other surfacing metals may prove better |
| 1000–1200°F | Advantages not definitely established |
| Above 1200°F | Considered advantageous — the sweet spot |
Resistance Properties
| Property | Rating |
|---|---|
| Creep resistance (1000–1200°F) | Great |
| Scaling resistance (combustion products, including leaded fuels) | Excellent — chromium promotes thin, adherent scale |
| Corrosion resistance (air, food, certain acids) | Good — field testing recommended |
| Metal-to-metal wear | Excellent — takes a high polish with low friction coefficient |
| Flow resistance and toughness | Inferior to tough martensitic steel deposits |
Machinability
- CoCr-A: Preferably machined with sintered carbide tools
- CoCr-B and CoCr-C: Increasingly difficult as carbon content increases
- CoCr-C deposits: Finished by grinding (machining is impractical)
. Copper-Base Alloys
The Scene: Bearing Surfaces, Corrosion, and the Art of Controlled Wear
Not all hard-facing applications involve extreme hardness. Bearing surfaces require a specific hardness relationship with their mating surface. Corrosion-resistant overlays need chemical stability. Copper-base alloys fill these roles with a versatility that spans from soft bearing surfaces to hard wear plates.
Designations and Forms
Copper-base alloys are available in an extensive range of rod and electrode forms:
Rods: RCuAl-A2, RCuAl-B, RCuAl-C, RCuAl-D, RCuAl-E, RCuSi-A, RCuSn, RCuSn-D, RCuSn-E, RCuZn-E
Electrodes: ECuAl-A2, ECuAl-B, ECuAl-C, ECuAl-D, ECuAl-E, ECuSi, ECuSn-A, ECuSn-C, ECuSn-E, ECuZn-E
Application Guide in the supplied reference
| Alloy Group | Hardness Range (BHN) | Primary Applications |
|---|---|---|
| CuAl-A2 | 130–190 | Bearing surfaces, corrosion-resistant surfaces |
| CuAl-B, CuAl-C | 140–290 | Bearing surfaces (mid-range hardness) |
| CuAl-D, CuAl-E | 230–390 | Gears, cams, wear plates, dies — high-hardness bearings |
| CuSn (Copper-Tin) | Lower range | Corrosion-resistant surfaces, moderate wear resistance |
Hardness: The Welding Process Factor
Hardness of a deposit depends upon the welding process employed and the manner of depositing the metal.
| Welding Process | Relative Hardness | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Inert-gas metal-arc (GMAW/GTAW) | Higher | Lower losses of Al, Sn, Si, Zn due to superior shielding from oxidation |
| Gas welding, metal-arc, carbon-arc | Lower | Greater oxidation losses reduce alloy content in deposit |
Critical temperature limitation: Copper-base alloys are not recommended for use at elevated temperatures because their hardness and mechanical properties decrease consistently as the temperature goes above 400°F.
Resistance Properties
| Alloy | Impact Resistance | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CuAl-A2 | Highest of all copper-base alloys | — |
| CuAl (increasing Al content) | Decreases markedly | Impact and aluminum content are inversely related |
| CuSi | Good | — |
| CuSn (as deposited) | Low | — |
| CuZn-E | Very low | — |
Corrosion resistance: With the exception of CuSn-E and CuZn-E, copper-base alloys are widely used to resist many acids, mild alkalies, and salt water. The CuAl filler metals form a protective oxide coating upon exposure to the atmosphere.
Abrasion limitation: Copper-base alloy deposits are not recommended for use where severe abrasion is encountered in service. Their strength lies in metal-to-metal wear resistance, bearing service, and corrosion protection — not in resisting hard-particle abrasion.
Bearing Surface Selection Rule
the practitioner selected for bearing surfaces should have a Brinell hardness of 50 to 75 units below that of the mating metal surface.
This hardness differential ensures that any wear occurs preferentially on the bearing surface (which can be rebuilt via hard facing) rather than on the more expensive shaft or housing.
Slight porosity is generally acceptable in bearing service because a porous deposit is able to retain oil for lubricating purposes — a deliberate design advantage.
Mechanical Properties in Compression
| Alloy | Elastic Limit (psi) | Ultimate Strength (psi) |
|---|---|---|
| CuAl | 25,000–65,000 | 120,000–171,000 |
| CuSi | 22,000 | 60,000 |
| CuZn-E | ~5,000 | ~20,000 |
Machinability
All copper-base alloy deposits can be machined. This is a significant advantage over many other hard-facing alloy families, particularly the austenitic high-chromium irons and the harder grades of nickel-chromium-boron alloys.
. Nickel-Chromium-Boron Alloys (RNiCr / ENiCr)
Designations and Forms
| Form | AWS Designation |
|---|---|
| Welding Rod | RNiCr |
| Electrode | ENiCr |
The Three NiCr Formulations
| Grade | Hardness (Rod, HRC) | Hardness (Electrode, HRC) |
|---|---|---|
| NiCr-A | 35–40 | 24–35 |
| NiCr-B | 45–50 | 30–45 |
| NiCr-C | 56–62 | 35–56 |
The lower hardness values and greater hardness ranges of electrode deposits are attributed to the dilution of deposit and base metals — the same phenomenon observed across all hard-facing alloy families.
Typical Applications
- Seal rings
- Cement pump screws
- Valves
- Screw conveyors
- Cams
Hot Hardness Data
The following data shows Rockwell C hardness values across temperature ranges from 600 to 1000°F, under conditions from instantaneous loading to 3-minute loading intervals:
NiCr-A:
| Source | 600°F | → 1000°F |
|---|---|---|
| Electrode deposits | 30 → 19 HRC | |
| Rod deposits | 34 → 24 HRC |
NiCr-B:
| Source | 600°F | → 1000°F |
|---|---|---|
| Electrode deposits | 41 → 26 HRC | |
| Rod deposits | 46 → 37 HRC |
NiCr-C:
| Source | 600°F | → 1000°F |
|---|---|---|
| Electrode deposits | 49 → 31 HRC | |
| Rod deposits | 55 → 40 HRC |
Rod deposits consistently outperform electrode deposits in hot hardness because of the lower dilution inherent in rod (gas welding) applications.
Resistance Properties
| Property | Rating |
|---|---|
| Light impact | Fair — deposits withstand it well |
| Plastic deformation cracking | NiCr-C most susceptible; NiCr-A and NiCr-B more resistant |
| Oxidation resistance | Good up to 1800°F |
| Maximum service temperature | 1750°F (fusion may begin near this temperature) |
| Atmospheric/steam corrosion | Completely resistant |
| Salt water/salt spray corrosion | Completely resistant |
| Mild acids and common corrosive chemicals | Completely resistant |
| High-stress grinding abrasion | Not recommended |
| Metal-to-metal wear | Good |
| Galling resistance | Particularly resistant — especially NiCr-C |
| Surface polish | Takes a high polish under wearing conditions |
The galling resistance of NiCr alloys — especially NiCr-C — is a standout property. In applications where two metal surfaces slide against each other under high load (seal rings, valve seats), galling can destroy components in hours. NiCr deposits resist this failure mode exceptionally well.
Mechanical Properties
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Elastic limit (compression) | 42,000 psi |
| Yield strength (0.01% offset, compression) | 92,000 psi |
| Yield strength (0.10% offset, compression) | 150,000 psi |
| Yield strength (0.20% offset, compression) | 210,000 psi |
Machinability
Deposits of NiCr filler metals may be machined with tungsten carbide tools using:
- Slow speeds
- Light feeds
- Heavy tool shanks (rigidity is critical)
They are also finished by grinding using a soft-to-medium vitrified silicon carbide wheel.
Master Comparison: All Six Alloy Families at a Glance
This is the table you print and hang in the shop. When a worn part comes across your workbench, this comparison tells you where to start.
| Property | High-Speed Steel | Austenitic Mn Steel | High-Cr Iron | Cobalt-Base | Copper-Base | NiCr-Boron |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Hardness | 55–60 HRC | 450–550 BHN (work-hardened) | 51–62 HRC | 48–58 HRC (CoCr-C) | 230–390 BHN | 56–62 HRC (NiCr-C) |
| Impact Resistance | Medium | High | Light only | Moderate | Varies by alloy | Fair (light) |
| Hot Hardness | Good to 1100°F | None (brittle >500°F) | Good to 800–900°F | Excellent (>1200°F) | Poor (>400°F) | Good to 1000°F |
| Abrasion (Low-Stress) | Good | Mediocre | Outstanding | Good | Poor | Good |
| Abrasion (High-Stress) | Good | Good (when work-hardened) | Mediocre | Moderate | Not suitable | Not recommended |
| Corrosion Resistance | Atmospheric only | Like carbon steel | Moist air rust | Good (air, food, acids) | Many acids, salt water | Excellent (atm, steam, salt) |
| Metal-to-Metal Wear | Excellent (hot) | Good (impact wear) | Low tension | Excellent | Good (bearings) | Good (anti-galling) |
| Machinability | Anneal first | Grinding only | Unmachinable | Carbide tools (A); grind (C) | All machinable | Carbide tools, slow |
| Max Service Temp | 1100°F | 500°F | 1800°F (oxidation) | 1200°F+ | 400°F | 1750°F |
| Typical Use | Cutting tools, dies | Crushers, railway | Agri, sand-blast | Engine valves, pumps | Bearings, corrosion | Seals, valves, cams |
Plasma Arc Surface Coating: The High-Volume Hard-Facing Process
When production volumes demand rapid deposition or when the substrate cannot tolerate high heat input, plasma arc surface coating becomes the process of choice.
