SI Prefixes — The Power of Powers of 10
SI units scale using standardized prefixes. For machining work, the most critical prefixes are:
| Prefix | Symbol | Factor | Common Machining Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| tera | T | 10¹² | — |
| giga | G | 10⁹ | Material modulus (GPa) |
| mega | M | 10⁶ | Stress, pressure (MPa) |
| kilo | k | 10³ | Force (kN), pressure (kPa), mass (kg) |
| hecto | h | 10² | — |
| deka | da | 10¹ | — |
| — | — | 10⁰ | Base unit |
| deci | d | 10⁻¹ | — |
| centi | c | 10⁻² | Length (cm) — avoid in technical drawings |
| milli | m | 10⁻³ | Length (mm), force (mN) |
| micro | µ | 10⁻⁶ | Length (µm), surface finish (µm Ra) |
| nano | n | 10⁻⁹ | Ultra-precision machining |
Critical SI Convention for Machining: Technical drawings use millimeters (mm) as the standard unit of length — not centimeters, not meters. When a drawing says "25.400" with no unit specified, it means millimeters. This is the universal convention in mechanical engineering worldwide.
Derived SI Units — The Language of Manufacturing
This is where the system becomes powerful. Every physical quantity encountered in machining operations is derived from those seven base units through simple mathematical relationships.
Derived Units with Special Names:
| Physical Quantity | SI Unit | Symbol | In Base Units | Machining Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Force | newton | N | kg·m/s² | Cutting forces, clamping forces |
| Pressure / Stress | pascal | Pa | N/m² = kg/(m·s²) | Material strength, hydraulic pressure |
| Energy / Work | joule | J | N·m = kg·m²/s² | Machining energy, heat generation |
| Power | watt | W | J/s = kg·m²/s³ | Spindle power, motor ratings |
| Frequency | hertz | Hz | 1/s | Spindle speed (RPM/60), vibration |
| Electric Resistance | ohm | Ω | V/A | EDM spark gap resistance |
| Electric Potential | volt | V | W/A | EDM voltage settings |
| Magnetic Flux | weber | Wb | V·s | Magnetic chucks |
Derived Units Without Special Names (Critical for Machining):
| Physical Quantity | SI Unit | Machining Application |
|---|---|---|
| Area | m² | Cross-sectional area of cut |
| Volume | m³ | Material removal rate |
| Velocity | m/s | Cutting speed |
| Acceleration | m/s² | Machine axis acceleration |
| Density | kg/m³ | Workpiece material density |
| Surface Tension | N/m | Coolant behavior |
| Dynamic Viscosity | N·s/m² (Pa·s) | Lubricant specification |
| Thermal Conductivity | W/(m·K) | Heat transfer in cutting |
The Newton — A Unit That Changes Everything
the practitioner had always expressed cutting forces in "pounds." His shop talked about "500 pounds of clamping force" or "the press needs 3 tons." But in SI, force and mass are fundamentally different quantities with different units.
In the English system, the pound serves double duty as both a unit of mass and a unit of force. This creates endless confusion. Is "10 pounds" a mass or a force? The answer depends on context, and that ambiguity is a breeding ground for errors.
SI eliminates this completely:
- Mass is measured in kilograms (kg) — this never changes regardless of gravity
- Force is measured in newtons (N) — defined as the force that accelerates 1 kg at 1 m/s²
The relationship:
To convert weight (a force) from mass:
Where (standard gravitational acceleration)
So a 1-kilogram mass exerts a gravitational force of approximately 9.81 newtons.
Why machinists must understand this: When a material specification says tensile strength is "500 MPa," that is 500 meganewtons per square meter. When a hydraulic cylinder spec says "10 kN," that is the force — not the weight of some mass. The newton makes force calculations unambiguous and independent of local gravitational conditions.
Key Force Conversions:
| From | To | Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 pound-force (lbf) | newtons (N) | 4.448222 |
| 1 newton (N) | pound-force (lbf) | 0.2248089 |
| 1 kilogram-force (kgf) | newtons (N) | 9.806650 (exact) |
| 1 dyne | newtons (N) | 0.00001 (exact) |
| 1 ounce-force | newtons (N) | 0.2780139 |
The Master Conversion Reference
the practitioner built himself a permanent reference — the conversion tables that would save him from error for the rest of his career. Here they are.
Linear Measurement — The Foundation
| From | To | Factor | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 inch | millimeters | 25.4 (exact) | The defining relationship |
| 1 inch | centimeters | 2.54 (exact) | |
| 1 inch | meters | 0.0254 (exact) | |
| 1 foot | millimeters | 304.8 (exact) | |
| 1 foot | meters | 0.3048 (exact) | |
| 1 yard | meters | 0.9144 (exact) | |
| 1 mile (statute) | kilometers | 1.609344 (exact) | |
| 1 millimeter | inches | 0.03937008 | |
| 1 meter | inches | 39.37008 | |
| 1 meter | feet | 3.280840 | |
| 1 kilometer | miles | 0.6213712 | |
| 1 microinch (µin.) | micrometers (µm) | 0.0254 (exact) | Surface finish |
| 1 micrometer (µm) | microinches (µin.) | 39.37008 | Surface finish |
The Conversion Table Every Machinist Needs — Inches to Millimeters:
| Inches | mm | Inches | mm | Inches | mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.001 | 0.0254 | 0.1 | 2.5400 | 1 | 25.4000 |
| 0.002 | 0.0508 | 0.2 | 5.0800 | 2 | 50.8000 |
| 0.003 | 0.0762 | 0.3 | 7.6200 | 3 | 76.2000 |
| 0.004 | 0.1016 | 0.4 | 10.1600 | 4 | 101.6000 |
| 0.005 | 0.1270 | 0.5 | 12.7000 | 5 | 127.0000 |
| 0.006 | 0.1524 | 0.6 | 15.2400 | 6 | 152.4000 |
| 0.007 | 0.1778 | 0.7 | 17.7800 | 7 | 177.8000 |
| 0.008 | 0.2032 | 0.8 | 20.3200 | 8 | 203.2000 |
| 0.009 | 0.2286 | 0.9 | 22.8600 | 9 | 228.6000 |
| 0.010 | 0.2540 | 1.0 | 25.4000 | 10 | 254.0000 |
How to Use the Table (Additive Method):
To convert 0.4476 inch to millimeters:
0.4 = 10.16000 mm
0.04 = 1.01600 mm
0.007 = 0.17780 mm
0.0006 = 0.01524 mm
——————————————————————
0.4476 = 11.36904 mm
To convert 84.9 mm to inches:
80. mm = 3.14961 in.
4. mm = 0.15748 in.
0.9 mm = 0.03543 in.
——————————————————————
84.9 mm = 3.34252 in.
the practitioner's Rule: Never round during intermediate steps. Carry at least 5 decimal places through every calculation, and only round the final answer to the precision warranted by your measurement instrument.
Area Conversions
| From | To | Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 inch² | mm² | 645.16 (exact) |
| 1 inch² | cm² | 6.4516 (exact) |
| 1 foot² | m² | 0.09290304 (exact) |
| 1 m² | inch² | 1,550.003 |
| 1 m² | foot² | 10.76391 |
| 1 cm² | inch² | 0.1550003 |
| 1 acre | hectares | 0.4046856 |
| 1 hectare | acres | 2.471054 |
Volume Conversions
| From | To | Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 inch³ | cm³ | 16.38706 |
| 1 foot³ | m³ | 0.02831685 |
| 1 m³ | inch³ | 61,023.76 |
| 1 m³ | foot³ | 35.31466 |
| 1 U.S. gallon | liters | 3.785412 |
| 1 liter | U.S. gallons | 0.2641720 |
Mass and Density Conversions
| From | To | Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 pound (avoirdupois) | kilograms | 0.4535924 |
| 1 kilogram | pounds | 2.204623 |
| 1 ounce (avoirdupois) | grams | 28.34952 |
| 1 gram | ounces | 0.03527397 |
| 1 short ton (2,000 lb) | kilograms | 907.1847 |
| 1 long ton (2,240 lb) | kilograms | 1,016.047 |
| 1 metric ton (tonne) | kilograms | 1,000 (exact) |
| 1 slug | kilograms | 14.59390 |
| 1 pound/inch³ | grams/cm³ | 27.67990 |
| 1 pound/foot³ | kg/m³ | 16.01846 |
Pressure and Stress Conversions — Critical for Material Specifications
This is where the practitioner made his biggest mistakes early on. A drawing that specified "tensile strength 690 MPa" meant nothing to him until he could translate it to the 100,000 PSI he was used to thinking in.
| From | To | Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 psi (lb/in²) | kilopascals (kPa) | 6.894757 |
| 1 psi | bar | 0.06894757 |
| 1 psi | kg/cm² | 0.07030697 |
| 1 psi | newtons/m² (Pa) | 6,894.757 |
| 1 kPa | psi | 0.1450377 |
| 1 bar | psi | 14.50377 |
| 1 atmosphere | psi | 14.696 |
| 1 atmosphere | pascals | 101,325 |
| 1 kg/cm² | psi | 14.22334 |
| 1 MPa | psi | 145.0377 |
Quick Mental Conversion:
- 1 MPa ≈ 145 psi (remember this number)
- 1 psi ≈ 6.9 kPa (close enough for quick estimates)
- 1 bar ≈ 14.5 psi (almost exactly 1 atmosphere)
Pressure Conversion Reference Table — PSI to kPa:
| psi | kPa | psi | kPa | psi | kPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.895 | 10 | 68.948 | 100 | 689.476 |
| 2 | 13.790 | 20 | 137.895 | 200 | 1,378.95 |
| 3 | 20.684 | 30 | 206.843 | 500 | 3,447.38 |
| 4 | 27.579 | 40 | 275.790 | 1,000 | 6,894.76 |
| 5 | 34.474 | 50 | 344.738 | 5,000 | 34,473.8 |
Pressure Conversion Reference Table — PSI to kg/cm²:
| psi | kg/cm² | psi | kg/cm² |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | 70.307 | 100 | 7.031 |
| 2,000 | 140.614 | 200 | 14.061 |
| 5,000 | 351.535 | 500 | 35.153 |
| 10,000 | 703.070 | 1,000 | 70.307 |
Energy, Work, and Power Conversions
| From | To | Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Btu | joules | 1,055.056 |
| 1 foot-pound | joules | 1.355818 |
| 1 joule | foot-pounds | 0.7375621 |
| 1 joule | Btu | 0.0009478 |
| 1 watt-hour | joules | 3,600 (exact) |
| 1 horsepower (550 ft·lb/s) | watts | 745.6999 |
| 1 horsepower (metric) | watts | 735.499 |
| 1 kilowatt | horsepower | 1.341022 |
Machining Power Formula (SI): The power required for a machining operation is:
Where is power in watts, is cutting force in newtons, and is cutting speed in m/s. In English units, the equivalent calculation requires conversion factors that make it far more error-prone.
Torque Conversions — Essential for Fastening and Fixturing
| From | To | Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 pound-force·inch | newton·meters | 0.1129848 |
| 1 pound-force·foot | newton·meters | 1.355818 |
| 1 newton·meter | pound-force·inches | 8.850746 |
| 1 newton·meter | pound-force·feet | 0.7375621 |
Torque Conversion Quick Reference — lbf·in to N·m:
| lbf·in | N·m | lbf·in | N·m |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.113 | 100 | 11.298 |
| 5 | 0.565 | 200 | 22.597 |
| 10 | 1.130 | 500 | 56.492 |
| 50 | 5.649 | 1,000 | 112.985 |
Velocity and Feed Rate Conversions
| From | To | Factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 foot/minute (fpm) | meters/minute | 0.3048 (exact) |
| 1 meter/minute | feet/minute | 3.280840 |
| 1 inch/minute | mm/minute | 25.4 (exact) |
| 1 mm/minute | inches/minute | 0.03937008 |
| 1 foot/second | meters/second | 0.3048 (exact) |
| 1 meter/second | feet/minute | 196.8504 |
| 1 mile/hour | km/hour | 1.609344 (exact) |
Temperature Conversions — For Heat Treatment and Machining
The Formulas:
Common Machining Reference Temperatures:
| Application | °F | °C |
|---|---|---|
| Room temperature (standard) | 68 | 20 |
| Tempering range (low) | 300–500 | 149–260 |
| Tempering range (high) | 500–800 | 260–427 |
| Stress relieving (steel) | 1,000–1,200 | 538–649 |
| Austenitizing (carbon steel) | 1,475–1,550 | 802–843 |
| Aluminum melting point | 1,220 | 660 |
| Copper melting point | 1,980 | 1,082 |
| Carbon steel melting point | ~2,500 | ~1,371 |
| Tungsten melting point | 6,098 | 3,370 |
These temperature values become critical in machining processes like EDM, where workpiece material properties directly affect spark behavior and metal removal rates.
Surface Finish — Where Measurement Systems Collide Most Often
Surface roughness is one of the most commonly confused measurements in cross-system work. The English system uses microinches (µin.) while SI uses micrometers (µm).
The Conversion:
Surface Finish Ranges in the supplied reference:
| Process | µin. Ra | µm Ra |
|---|---|---|
| Fine grinding | 4–16 | 0.10–0.41 |
| Grinding | 16–64 | 0.41–1.63 |
| Boring, broaching, reaming | 32–64 | 0.81–1.63 |
| Turning (finish) | 32–125 | 0.81–3.18 |
| Milling (finish) | 32–125 | 0.81–3.18 |
| Recommended for threads | 63–125 | 1.60–3.18 |
Critical Warning from the Standards: For interference-fit threads, surface roughness between 63 and 125 µin. Ra is recommended. Roughness greater than 125 µin. Ra encourages galling and tearing. Roughness less than 63 µin. Ra may hold insufficient lubricant and cause surfaces to wring or weld together. These limits apply equally when expressed as 1.6 to 3.2 µm Ra.
Microinch to Micrometer Conversion Table:
| µin. | µm | µin. | µm | µin. | µm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.102 | 32 | 0.813 | 125 | 3.175 |
| 8 | 0.203 | 63 | 1.600 | 250 | 6.350 |
| 16 | 0.406 | 100 | 2.540 | 500 | 12.700 |
The Coherent System — Why SI Units Work Together
the practitioner's "Aha" moment came when he realized that SI isn't just a list of unit conversions — it's a coherent system where the mathematical product or quotient of any two units automatically yields the correct unit for the result.
In a coherent system:
- Velocity = meter per second (m/s) — just length ÷ time
- Acceleration = meter per second squared (m/s²) — velocity ÷ time
- Force = newton = kg·m/s² — mass × acceleration (Newton's Second Law)
- Work/Energy = joule = newton·meter = kg·m²/s² — force × distance
- Power = watt = joule/second = kg·m²/s³ — energy ÷ time
- Pressure = pascal = newton/m² = kg/(m·s²) — force ÷ area
No conversion factors. No "g" constants floating around. No confusion between mass and force.
In the English system, the same calculation for force requires:
Where = 32.174 lb·ft/(lbf·s²) is a dimensional constant you must remember to include. Forget it, and your answer is wrong by a factor of 32.
This is why aerospace engineers lost a spacecraft. Not because anyone was incompetent. Because non-coherent unit systems require constant vigilance against conversion errors, and human vigilance always fails eventually.
Electrical Units in Machining — EDM and Beyond
Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) brought electrical units squarely into the practitioner's daily vocabulary. The SI units for electrical quantities are:
| Quantity | SI Unit | Symbol | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electric potential | volt | V | Potential difference when 1 watt of power dissipates with 1 ampere of current |
| Capacitance | farad | F | Capacitance when 1 coulomb of charge produces 1 volt |
| Resistance | ohm | Ω | Resistance when 1 volt produces 1 ampere |
| Magnetic flux | weber | Wb | Flux that produces 1 volt EMF when reduced to zero in 1 second |
| Inductance | henry | H | Inductance when 1 volt EMF is produced by current change of 1 ampere/second |
| Luminous flux | lumen | lm | Flux in 1 steradian from a 1 candela source |
Ohm's Law — The Fundamental Electrical Relationship:
Where = volts, = amperes, = ohms, = watts.
In EDM operations, the arc gap voltage is ideally about 35 volts, and the power selection rule of thumb for graphite and copper electrodes is 50 to 65 amps per square inch of electrode engagement.
Engineering Abbreviations — The Shorthand of the Shop
When the practitioner started reading technical documentation from international suppliers, he encountered a blizzard of abbreviations. Here are the ones every machinist needs to recognize:
Measurement Abbreviations:
| Abbreviation | Meaning | Abbreviation | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| mm | millimeter | psi or lb/in² | pounds per square inch |
| cm | centimeter | kPa | kilopascal |
| m | meter | MPa | megapascal |
| km | kilometer | GPa | gigapascal |
| µm | micrometer (micron) | Pa | pascal |
| µin. | microinch | N | newton |
| in. | inch | kN | kilonewton |
| ft | foot | J | joule |
| yd | yard | kJ | kilojoule |
| lb | pound | W | watt |
| oz | ounce | kW | kilowatt |
| kg | kilogram | hp | horsepower |
| g | gram | Btu | British thermal unit |
| Ra | roughness average | N·m | newton-meter |
System Abbreviations:
| Abbreviation | System |
|---|---|
| SI | Système International d'Unités |
| CGS | centimeter-gram-second |
| MKS | meter-kilogram-second |
| MKSA | meter-kilogram-second-ampere |
| fps | foot-pound-second |
Best Practice for Abbreviations:
- Abbreviate units only when preceded by numerals: "several inches" (not "several in."), "12 in." (correct)
- Never begin a sentence with a numeral followed by an abbreviation
- When in doubt, spell out the unit
The Complete Machining Unit Conversion Workflow
the practitioner developed a systematic approach to unit conversion that eliminated errors. Here it is, step by step:
Step 1: Identify the Source System
Read the drawing or specification. Determine whether dimensions are in:
- Inches (decimal) — US machining drawings
- Millimeters — ISO/metric drawings
- Mixed — some older drawings use both
Step 2: Convert Using Exact Factors
Always use the exact conversion: 1 inch = 25.4 mm. Never use rounded approximations during calculations.
Step 3: Carry Full Precision
Maintain at least 5 significant digits through all intermediate calculations. Round only the final result.
Step 4: Verify Against Tolerance
After conversion, verify that your converted dimension and tolerance fall within the correct range. A tolerance of ±0.001 inch is ±0.0254 mm — not ±0.025 mm.
Step 5: Check Units on Every Quantity
Force in newtons or pounds? Pressure in MPa or PSI? Surface finish in µm or µin.? Confirm every unit, every time.
Quick Reference — The Conversions You'll Use Every Day
Tape this to your toolbox:
| I Have | I Want | Multiply By |
|---|---|---|
| inches | mm | 25.4 |
| mm | inches | 0.03937 |
| feet | meters | 0.3048 |
| pounds (mass) | kilograms | 0.4536 |
| pounds-force | newtons | 4.4482 |
| psi | MPa | 0.006895 |
| psi | kPa | 6.8948 |
| MPa | psi | 145.04 |
| ft·lbf | N·m | 1.3558 |
| in·lbf | N·m | 0.1130 |
| hp | kW | 0.7457 |
| °F | °C | (°F − 32) × 5/9 |
| µin. (Ra) | µm (Ra) | 0.0254 |
| fpm (cutting speed) | m/min | 0.3048 |
Engineering takeaway
the practitioner didn't just learn to convert units. He learned that measurement systems are languages, and becoming fluent in both English and SI units made him fundamentally more capable as a machinist.
Here's what he — and you — should take away:
- The inch-millimeter relationship is exact. 1 inch = 25.4 mm. No rounding, no approximation, no exceptions.
- SI is coherent. Every unit derives logically from seven base units. No arbitrary conversion factors, no hidden constants.
- Force and mass are different things. In SI, mass is kilograms, force is newtons. Never confuse them.
- Surface finish conversions matter. 1 µin. = 0.0254 µm. A 125 µin. Ra spec is 3.175 µm Ra — not "about 3 µm."
- Carry full precision. Round only the final answer to match your measurement capability.
- Pressure conversions are a constant need. 1 MPa ≈ 145 psi. Memorize this and verify everything else.
The Mars Climate Orbiter was destroyed because two teams spoke different unit languages and nobody translated. In your shop, the consequences may be smaller — but they add up to scrapped parts, missed tolerances, lost contracts, and damaged reputations.
Master both systems. Verify every conversion. Never assume "close enough."
Your Next Step
Pull up the last three drawings you worked on. Identify every unit of measurement on each drawing — length, tolerance, surface finish, material strength, torque specifications. Now convert every single value to the opposite system.
If you can do it without a mistake, you're fluent.
If you can't, you now have the reference guide to get there.
What's the most expensive unit conversion error you've ever seen on the shop floor? That story — the one that made everyone slow down and double-check — is worth sharing. Because in precision manufacturing, the person who catches the unit error before the part is cut is worth their weight in gold... or should we say, 31.10348 grams per troy ounce?
