KEVOS
ArticlesServicesCase studiesAboutContact
ArticlesServicesCase studiesAboutContact
← ArticlesThe Pohst-Zassenhaus TheoremEngineering · Engineering MathematicsLesson 813/884← PrevNext →
ArticlePublished 7 Aug 20262 min readBy Kevin JoginPohst Zassenhausradicalring of multipliersp-maximality
On this page

Ask about this page

KEVOS AIThe Pohst-Zassenhaus Theorem

KEVOS knowledge first · trusted web sources when needed

Maximal Orders and Decomposition II

The Pohst-Zassenhaus Theorem

The theorem underlying maximal order computation: enlarging an order by the ring of multipliers of its radical.

Engineering / MathematicsMaximal Orders and Decomposition II2 min readKV-MATH-0611

The Pohst-Zassenhaus theorem tells you how to enlarge a non-maximal order and, crucially, when to stop. It is the theoretical engine of the Round 2 algorithm.

The statement

For an order and a prime, consider the radical of the order modulo that prime, and the ring of elements of the field multiplying that radical into itself. That ring is an order containing the original, and it equals the original exactly when the original is maximal at the prime.

O' = { x in K : x I_p contained in I_p }I_p the p-radical of O; O' is an order containing O.

Key point

The theorem gives both a construction and a termination criterion in one statement. Enlargement produces a strictly larger order unless the original was already p-maximal, and the index divides at each step, so the process terminates.

The p-radical

Definition
The set of elements of the order whose image in the quotient modulo p is nilpotent.
Alternative description
The intersection of the prime ideals of the order above p.
Computation
As the kernel of an iterated Frobenius-like map — see radical computation.

Termination

Each enlargement strictly reduces the power of the prime dividing the index, so the number of steps is bounded by the exponent of that prime in the polynomial discriminant.

Number of enlargement steps at p <= v_p(disc(T)) / 2Because the index appears squared.

Note

In practice very few steps are needed — often one. The bound is pessimistic, but having it is what makes the algorithm provably terminating rather than merely observed to terminate.

Why the radical

Key point

The radical is the right object because failure of maximality is precisely a failure of the quotient modulo p to be a product of fields. The radical measures that failure, and elements multiplying it into itself are exactly the ones the order is missing.

Relation to the algorithm

The theorem is applied prime by prime inside the Round 2 algorithm, with the Dedekind criterion used first as a cheap test to avoid the enlargement work where it is unnecessary.

Source. Henri Cohen, A Course in Computational Algebraic Number Theory, Springer GTM 138 — 6.1.1. Structural reference unverified: the source file was not available during authoring; chapter and section numbers are taken from the published edition and have not been checked against a physical copy.

Related pages

  • The Maximal Order Problem
  • The Dedekind Criterion for p-Maximality

Continue learning

The Maximal Order ProblemArticle · Engineering MathematicsNEXT LESSON →The Dedekind Criterion for p-MaximalityArticle · Engineering MathematicsComputing the Structure of Residue RingsArticle · Engineering MathematicsThe Round 2 Maximal Order AlgorithmArticle · Engineering Mathematics
KEVOS · Engineering, manufacturing and project improvement
ArticlesServicesCase studiesAboutContact
© 2026 KEVOS®