KEVOS® Project Delivery Handbook
Managing Project Communications
Why This Matters: Communication Failure Is the 1 Project Killer A practical KEVOS handbook for project delivery teams.
In this handbook article
- Why This Matters: Communication Failure Is the #1 Project Killer
- What Is "Manage Communications"?
- The PMBOK Process View
- How It Works: The Dimensions of Communication
- Communication Forms
- Quality Communication
- Performance Reporting: The Backbone of Project Control
- Reporting Frequency
- Report Types
- Exception Reporting
- Stakeholder Relationship Management
- Control Communications
- Information Management Systems
- The Communication Channels Formula
- The Pitfalls: Where Communications Management Goes Wrong
- Real-World Application: The Defence & Heavy Engineering Context
- Key Takeaways
Why This Matters: Communication Failure Is the #1 Project Killer
PMI's Pulse of the Profession surveys consistently reveal the same finding: poor communication is the primary contributor to project failure. Not budget overruns. Not scope creep. Not technical complexity. Communication.
And the reason is deceptively simple: every other project management process depends on information flowing to the right people, at the right time, in the right format. When that flow breaks down, decisions are made on stale data, stakeholders lose confidence, risks go unreported, and teams work at cross-purposes.
Managing project communications during execution is not about sending more emails or scheduling more meetings. It is about designing and controlling the information architecture that keeps the entire project organism alive.
Core Principle: The performance reporting process involves the distribution of performance information to key stakeholders, specifically capturing how resources are being used to achieve project objectives.
What Is "Manage Communications"?
Manage Communications is the PMBOK process responsible for creating, collecting, distributing, storing, and dispositioning project information in accordance with the Communications Management Plan. During execution, this process ensures that stakeholders receive the information they need to make informed decisions and maintain confidence in the project.
The PMBOK Process View
| Inputs | Tools & Techniques | Outputs |
|---|---|---|
| Communications Management Plan | Communications technology | Project communications |
| Work Performance Reports | Communication models | Project Management Plan updates |
| Enterprise environmental factors | Communication methods | Project documents updates |
| Organisational process assets | Information management systems | Organisational process assets updates |
| Performance reporting |
Relationship details
| From | Relationship | To |
|---|---|---|
| Communications — Management Plan | leads to | Manage — Communications |
| Work Performance — Reports | leads to | Manage — Communications |
| Enterprise Environmental — Factors | leads to | Manage — Communications |
| Organisational — Process Assets | leads to | Manage — Communications |
| Manage — Communications | leads to | Project — Communications |
| Manage — Communications | leads to | PM Plan Updates |
| Manage — Communications | leads to | Project Document — Updates |
| Manage — Communications | leads to | OPA Updates |
How It Works: The Dimensions of Communication
Communication Forms
Project communication is not monolithic. It operates across multiple dimensions simultaneously, and the PM must consciously choose the right form for each situation:
| Dimension | Forms | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Medium | Written and oral; listening and speaking | Written for formal records; oral for nuance and relationship-building |
| Direction | Internal and external | Internal for team alignment; external for stakeholder management |
| Formality | Formal and informal | Formal for governance; informal for trust-building |
| Hierarchy | Vertical and horizontal | Vertical for escalation and reporting; horizontal for coordination |
Internal" --> "External · Informal" --> "Formal
Governance Reviews & Audits
- Classify relevant stakeholders here
Stakeholder Reports & Briefs
- Classify relevant stakeholders here
Team Stand-ups & Chat
- Classify relevant stakeholders here
Contractor Coordination
- Classify relevant stakeholders here
Quality Communication
Not all communication is equal. The course materials identify five hallmarks of quality communication:
- Expressing oneself simply and objectively — Clarity over cleverness
- Effective listening — Understanding before responding
- Contributing information effectively and with tact — Delivering hard truths without destroying relationships
- Acknowledging and using the expertise and advice of others — Leveraging collective intelligence
- Explaining what you and your team are doing — Transparency builds trust
The Communication Formula: Quality communication = Clarity + Listening + Tact + Humility + Transparency. Remove any one element and trust begins to erode.
Performance Reporting: The Backbone of Project Control
Performance reporting is a control mechanism that produces standardised reports and reviews at defined intervals. It transforms raw work performance data into actionable intelligence for decision-makers.
Reporting Frequency
The Communications Management Plan defines when reports are due. Common triggers include:
| Trigger | Frequency | Audience |
|---|---|---|
| Project Milestones | On achievement | Stakeholders, Sponsors |
| Phase/Project Completion | On completion | All stakeholders (wide distribution) |
| Periodic intervals | Fortnightly, monthly, or quarterly | Program management, steering committees |
| Organisational policies | As prescribed | Governance bodies |
Report Types
The course materials define four distinct report types, each serving a different purpose in the project information architecture:
Relationship details
| From | Relationship | To |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Project — Report | Routine status | Stakeholders |
| Milestone — Report | On achievement | Stakeholders |
| Quarterly — Report | Periodic summary | Program — Management |
| Project/Phase — Completion Report | Phase/Project close | All Stakeholders — (Wide Distribution) |
| Exception — Report | Significant deviations | Escalation — Path |
Standard Project Report Format
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| 1. Summary or Overview | Executive-level project status snapshot |
| 2. Schedule | Current schedule performance against baseline |
| 3. Activities Summary | Progress to date, planned work not completed, future activities |
| 4. Technical Aspects | Technical issues, design changes, quality concerns |
| 5. Financial Aspects | Budget performance, expenditure tracking |
| 6. Administrative Aspects | Governance, procurement, contract updates |
| 7. Problems and Issues | Open issues, risks materialised, blockers |
Milestone Report Format
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| 1. Summary or Overview | Milestone achievement status |
| 2. Schedule | Milestone dates vs. baseline |
| 3. Activities Summary | Work completed to reach milestone |
| 4. Technical Aspects | Technical deliverables at milestone |
| 5. Financial Aspects | Cost performance at milestone |
| 6. Administrative Aspects | Contractual and governance items |
Quarterly Report Format
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| 1. Background | Project context and purpose |
| 2. Progress for Reporting Period | Work accomplished in the quarter |
| 3. Planned Progress for Next Quarter | Forecast of upcoming work |
| 4. Human Resource Aspects | Team changes, capacity, performance |
| 5. Financial Aspects | Quarterly financial performance |
| 6. Problems and Issues | Open issues and risks |
| 7. Recommendations | Actions proposed for management decision |
Project/Phase Completion Report Format
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| 1. Summary or Overview | Final project/phase status |
| 2. Contractual Performance | Contractor and vendor performance assessment |
| 3. Administrative Performance | Governance compliance |
| 4. Performance against Scope, Schedule, Budget & Quality | Final variance analysis against all baselines |
| 5. Organisational Aspects | Impact on the organisation |
| 6. Project Management Aspects | PM process effectiveness |
| 7. Lessons Learned | What worked, what didn't, recommendations for future projects |
Exception Reporting
Exception reports are triggered by significant deviations from the project plan. They sit outside the regular reporting cycle and demand immediate attention. Triggers include:
- Failure to achieve a milestone
- Significant variations from plan, schedule, or budget
- Significant trends in under- or over-achievement of expenditure
- Unforeseen changes in project team requirements or unresolved conflict
- Significant changes in risk assessment
The Exception Reporting Rule: If a deviation is large enough that a stakeholder would be surprised to learn about it at the next scheduled report, it requires an exception report now. Surprise is the enemy of stakeholder trust.
Stakeholder Relationship Management
The supplementary readings reinforce a critical truth: communication is not just about transmitting information — it is about managing relationships. Michael Wood's four principles of stakeholder relationship management provide the strategic lens:
Principle 1: Consider the Organisation Culture and Political Environment Every organisation has its own values, beliefs, and behaviours. Subcultures exist within the macro-culture. The PM must adapt communication style to fit each stakeholder group's expectations, agendas, and risk appetite.
Principle 2: Fit the Communication Plan to the Project's Impact All projects need communication plans, but the scale and formality should match the project's impact on the organisation. A minor internal tool upgrade does not need the same communication infrastructure as a multi-year defence procurement program.
The Trust Factor: Joe Wynne's article on trust and stakeholders illustrates that communication failures compound. When team leads appear unprepared in stakeholder meetings, or when deliverables are submitted without quality review, stakeholders lose confidence — and once lost, trust takes far longer to rebuild than it took to destroy.
Control Communications
Throughout the project lifecycle, communications must be monitored and controlled to ensure stakeholder information needs are met. This process focuses on optimising information flow — ensuring neither too much nor too little information reaches each audience.
| Inputs | Tools & Techniques | Outputs |
|---|---|---|
| Project Management Plan | Information management systems | Work performance information |
| Project communications | Expert judgement | Change requests |
| Issue log | Meetings | Project Management Plan updates |
| Work performance data | Project documents updates | |
| Organisational process assets | Organisational process assets updates |
Information Management Systems
In the project context, information management systems provide an efficient means to capture, store, and distribute information. Distribution formats include:
- Table reporting
- Spreadsheet analysis
- Presentations
- Letters
- Emails
Visual Reporting Advantage: Andrew Makar's article on visual reporting makes a compelling case: people skim reports rather than read them. Visual formats — dashboards, one-page summaries, traffic-light indicators — make it easier for stakeholders to absorb status and engage in meaningful conversation about scope, resource, and timeline concerns.
Relationship details
| From | Relationship | To |
|---|---|---|
| Work Performance — Data | leads to | Performance — Reporting |
| Performance — Reporting | leads to | Project — Communications |
| Project — Communications | leads to | Stakeholder — Feedback |
| Stakeholder — Feedback | leads to | Change — Requests |
| Change — Requests | leads to | PM Plan — Update |
| PM Plan — Update | leads to | Work Performance — Data |
The Communication Channels Formula
As a team grows, the number of potential communication channels increases exponentially. The formula for calculating communication channels is:
Where C = number of communication channels and n = number of stakeholders.
| Team Size (n) | Communication Channels |
|---|---|
| 5 | 10 |
| 10 | 45 |
| 15 | 105 |
| 20 | 190 |
| 50 | 1,225 |
The Scaling Problem: A project with 10 stakeholders has 45 potential communication channels. At 50 stakeholders, that number explodes to 1,225. This is why the Communications Management Plan is not optional — without it, information flows chaotically and critical messages get lost in noise.
The Pitfalls: Where Communications Management Goes Wrong
1. Reporting Without Purpose Producing reports because the schedule says to, not because they contain actionable information. Every report should answer: What decision does this enable?
2. Over-Communication Flooding stakeholders with information they do not need. This creates noise, causes important messages to be missed, and erodes confidence in the PM's judgement.
3. Under-Communication on Bad News The instinct to delay or soften bad news is natural — and destructive. Exception reports exist precisely for this. Stakeholders can handle bad news; they cannot handle surprises.
4. Ignoring the Invisible Customer Brad Egeland's article warns about the scenario where the customer disengages from the project. Even if the customer stops attending meetings, the PM must still deliver to their requirements. Proactive communication — even when it is one-directional — protects the project.
5. One Communication Style for All Stakeholders Senior executives need one-page dashboards. Technical leads need detailed technical reports. Contractors need contractual performance data. Tailoring communication to the audience is not a luxury — it is a requirement.
Real-World Application: The Defence & Heavy Engineering Context
In defence and heavy engineering projects, communications management takes on additional complexity:
- Classification and security clearances restrict who can receive what information
- Configuration management requires formal documentation of every design change
- Multi-tiered contractor structures demand reporting hierarchies (prime contractor → sub-contractor → sub-sub-contractor)
- Government audit requirements mandate specific report formats and retention periods
- Geographic distribution (international supply chains, remote sites) requires deliberate use of communications technology to bridge distances
The PM in this environment must design a communication architecture that satisfies governance requirements while still keeping information flowing fast enough for effective decision-making.
Relationship details
| From | Relationship | To |
|---|---|---|
| Project Team — • Daily stand‑ups — • Informal updates | leads to | Program Management — • Monthly reports — • Formal reviews |
| Program Management — • Monthly reports — • Formal reviews | leads to | Steering Committee / Sponsors — • Quarterly briefs — • Executive dashboard |
| Steering Committee / Sponsors — • Quarterly briefs — • Executive dashboard | leads to | External Stakeholders / Regulators — • Milestone reports — • Exception reporting |
| Program Management — • Monthly reports — • Formal reviews | leads to | Project Team — • Daily stand‑ups — • Informal updates |
| Steering Committee / Sponsors — • Quarterly briefs — • Executive dashboard | leads to | Program Management — • Monthly reports — • Formal reviews |
| External Stakeholders / Regulators — • Milestone reports — • Exception reporting | leads to | Steering Committee / Sponsors — • Quarterly briefs — • Executive dashboard |
Key Takeaways
- Manage Communications is the process that ensures the right information reaches the right stakeholders at the right time during execution.
- Communication operates across four dimensions: medium (written/oral), direction (internal/external), formality (formal/informal), and hierarchy (vertical/horizontal).
- Performance reporting is a control mechanism with four standard formats: Standard, Milestone, Quarterly, and Project/Phase Completion — plus Exception Reports for significant deviations.
- Control Communications optimises information flow and prevents both over- and under-communication.
- The communication channels formula explains why communications management becomes exponentially more complex as stakeholder numbers grow.
- Visual reporting is more effective than text-heavy reports because stakeholders skim, not read.
- Stakeholder trust is built through consistent, tailored, transparent communication — and destroyed by surprises and poor preparation.
References:
PMBOK Guide, 5th Edition, PMI, 2013 — Chapter 10: Project Communications Management
Wood, M.R. (2009). Stakeholder Relationship Management: A Primer. ProjectManagement.com
Makar, A. (2011). Improving Project Status with Visual Reporting. ProjectManagement.com
Wynne, J. (2009). Trust, Business Stakeholders and Your Workforce. ProjectManagement.com
Egeland, B. (2011). Attack of the Invisible Customers! ProjectManagement.com
